
Bernie Madoff’s guilty plea today makes him the latest confirmed proprietor of a ponzi scheme, adding him to the long list dating back to the original namesake Charles Ponzi. Charles himself wasn’t the first to use the technique, but his was the first large scale use in the US and so his name is infamously linked to the scheme. So what exactly is a ponzi scheme and how do they work?
A ponzi scheme pays returns to investors either from their own money or the money of other investors rather than from profitable investments. High returns in the scheme typically make early investors more likely to reinvest their returns and also attracts new investors. As the scheme grows it becomes more and more difficult to maintain, since an increasing number of new investments or reinvestments are required to keep it afloat. This is similar to a pyramid scheme except that ponzi schemes tend to have a flat hierarchy where the fraudster deals directly with victims and is the only one to profit.
Most ponzi schemes have at their core a seemingly plausible business or investment idea. Investors are sold on this idea and believe that this is how their money will be invested. When profits and supporting documentation start rolling in the credibility of the business idea is further enhanced, which probably inspires them to reinvest their returns or invest even more.
Suppose a schemer promised 10 people a return of 25% on their $1000 investment within 30 days. After the 30 days they could tell each of those people that their return had been achieved. Given the option of having their money (with profit) returned, or reinvested most would probably choose the reinvestment option. Some might even want to invest more or bring in friends to get in on such a good deal. Even if half want to get out, the schemer could easily pay them $1,250 each ($6,250 total) from the $10,000 they had originally received. Since the claimed returns are so great and investors are shown the appearance of success, payouts would likely remain very low. As long as payouts remain lower than the money taken in, the scheme is able to continue.
Bernard Madoff Guilty Of Ponzi Scheme, SEC Charges Two Others

After Bernie Madoff is pleaded guilty in a Ponzi Scheme and ordered to jail SEC has charged two others from California in a multi-million dollar Ponzi scheme type of investment fraud.
The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged Northern California residents Anthony Vassallo and Kenneth Kenitzer for orchestrating a multi-million dollar investment fraud. Vassallo agreed to a court order freezing his assets. The SEC is seeking an emergency court order to also freeze the assets of Vassallo’s company, Equity Investment Management and Trading, Inc. (EIMT).
According to the SEC’s complaint, Vassallo and Kenitzer raised more than $40 million from about 150 investors from approximately May 2004 to November 2008. Vassallo told investors, many of whom he met through his church, that he had a proprietary computer software program that allowed him to buy and sell stock options and generate returns of 3.5 percent per month with little risk of loss. The SEC alleges that Vassallo and Kenitzer instead used investors’ money for unauthorized purposes, including a variety of other schemes never disclosed to investors.
“Today’s action reaffirms that the SEC will take immediate steps to preserve assets for investors victimized in fraudulent investment schemes,” said Marc Fagel, Director of the SEC’s San Francisco Regional Office. “The defendants’ deception went so far as fabricating computer ’screen shots’ for investors that purported to show more than $50 million in securities holdings, when in fact they had completely emptied the brokerage accounts.”
The SEC’s complaint, filed in federal court in Sacramento, alleges that Vassallo told investors that their money was being invested in securities pursuant to a proprietary trading strategy that promised high returns with minimal risk. From September 2007 through approximately November 2008, Kenitzer, who participated in EIMT’s day-to-day operations, posted false trading results on the company’s Web site and distributed phony investment reports to investors that led them to believe EIMT was achieving consistent, positive returns. According to the SEC’s complaint, EIMT actually had not conducted any stock trades since at least September 2007, when its brokerage firm terminated Vassallo’s trading privileges. The SEC alleges that Vassallo and Kenitzer kept the scheme going by using money raised from new investors to pay earlier investors, a classic hallmark of a Ponzi scheme.
Popularity: 4% [?]







